I don't shoot high ISO or sports or video and when I do I have gear that's suitable to those tasks. What I really want is a XPro4 w'36MP and a 5MP EVF. I like the Fuji cameras a lot but there's a few things I *need*. If I have to run the ISO up 2 stops since no IS, the FF high iso advantage just flew out the window. But the "lowly" 18-55 has 2-3 stops of IS at least. And I thought I could use old mf lenses I already had so I didn't have to spend a lot on FF lenses. But I really lost momentum comparing the aps body I shot to the FF body at iso 100 on a test site. I mean it's possible if you don't mind carrying it. I've recently discovered that it's actually pretty difficult to do better than canon aps + kit lenses. I get excellent quality images up to 24x36 from my X-T3 and would not go back to a full frame camera as I don't want the size/weight. From the beginning I have been happy with my Fuji cameras/lenses. I'm happy using my current Fuji X system (XT-3 and X-Pro2 with a nice range of lenses) for anything I shoot at this point.įour years ago I switched from shooting a full frame Nikon to the Fuji X cameras. So while I do occasionally drool over GFX specs and images I don't have any desire to pick up a FF system again. I don't have any experience with Sony FF either. The Sony-built Fuji X sensors are also much more ISO-invariant than Canon sensors so I have better results for astro-photographer too (no purple amp glow when raising exposure, for example).ĭR and pixel-level sharpness were actually *better* than Canon FF sensors of that vintage (6D, 5D Mark III), but I understand Canon has upped their game a bit since then so current mileage may differ. The 6D did have a slight (~0.5-1 stop) high ISO advantage in noise, but using fast glass with lower apertures to get the necessary DOF for events negated it since I could get the shot with a lower ISO (e.g. After a year of side-by-side use I sold all my Canon gear, since I was getting better results with my Fuji system and enjoyed shooting with it much more. I picked up an X-T2 when I was still shooting with a Canon 6D and L glass. I have not felt the need for a "full frame" system since I switched away from Canon in 2013. When I want portability, light weight, speed, etc., I have Fuji X. When I want a bigger sensor, I have a GFX100. If I had to pick just one system though, I'd probably stick with Fuji. 35mm f/1.4 on FF) is a look that cannot be easily replicated with APS-C wide-angle with relatively shallow DOF (e.g. I shoot both formats as well, so it kind of did, but not so much for image quality reasons: However I keep going back to a t3 and my 35/1.4 and 56/1.4 for candid family pics and hikes (14/35mm). Got my medium format itch hence trying out the gfx system for slow landscapes when weight is not an issue (Eg road trips). If your work needs crazy high DR at low ISO you will lose a bit of DR with Fuji X, compared to your d850 or a Sony a7r4. But Fujifilm 24MP and 26MP files are excellent, and you can reliably make excellent 20" x 30" prints from them. If your photography requires very large prints (and you work in ways that can produce them), then full frame makes sense. I shoot both full frame (Canon) and APS-C (Fujifilm). Then when Fuji released the GFX, I got the itch and ended up getting it. So in the end I sold my Canon gear and happy with XF for a while. XT1 with 56mm f1.2 used to give me more in focus shots than my 85L II on 5dmk3. With full frame offerings from the big 3 do you ever feel the crop sensor leaves you wanting a bigger sensor? I love both and also have the Nikon D850. I have a Fuji X-T3 and recently bought the Fuji X-S10 which also is a fun camera to use. Does Fuji X Leave You Wanting More Compared to Full Frame?.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |